TradesViz Review 2026: Plans, Replay, AI & Verdict

TradesViz Pricing: Free Has Limits, and the Paid Tiers Differ

As of September 22, 2026, the official pricing table lists Basic at $0, Pro at a standard $14.99 per month billed annually, and Platinum at a standard $22.49 per month billed annually. The page says annual billing saves 25%, or three months, and both paid plans have a seven-day trial. A short Labor Day promotion was visible during this check; the table below deliberately records the crossed-through standard annual equivalents instead of turning a temporary coupon into a durable price claim.

These are current standard annual-plan equivalents, not a promise about checkout, renewal, tax, currency conversion, add-ons or future entitlements. The pricing page still displays an expired September promotion, so use the standard prices unless the checkout explicitly applies a valid offer. Verify the official pricing and feature matrix for the account you would actually buy.

Is TradesViz Free?

Yes, Basic is a real ongoing free tier—but its import boundary matters more than the word “free.” TradesViz lists stock imports, one trading account, and a cap of 3,000 executions per month. Its subscription FAQ says the free version can sync stock trades from supported brokers; importing or syncing non-stock trades requires Pro or Platinum.

That makes Basic a credible test for a stock trader whose source is supported and whose execution count stays within the cap. It is not a free route for options, futures, forex, crypto, or CFD imports. The cleanest evaluation is to import a duplicate-safe sample account, reconcile fills and fees, inspect grouping, export the result, and only then decide whether the paid workflow earns its recurring cost.

Is There a Public TradesViz API?

A general customer or developer API is not established by the current public pages. In this review, we searched TradesViz's current pricing page, general FAQ, searchable product FAQ, importing guide, and broker directory. Those pages document manual files, strict Custom and Custom Alt templates, exports, auto-sync, and API-based broker login-and-sync. We did not find public developer documentation for a general customer API that exposes journal data to arbitrary integrations.

A broker API connection is not the same thing as a customer-facing product API. The first lets TradesViz receive data from a supported broker; the second would normally have published authentication, endpoints, scopes, rate limits, data schemas, versioning, and support terms for code you build. Absence from the pages we checked does not prove a private or supported-on-request interface does not exist. It means the earlier “open API on all tiers” claim cannot remain a buying premise without documentation.

If programmatic access is decisive, get the current developer documentation and plan entitlement in writing before subscribing. CSV or native export supports portability, but it does not by itself provide an API.

5 Things TradesViz Gets Right

1. Analytics Depth With Traceable Drill-Down

TradesViz's official FAQ describes roughly 600 statistics and charts across the platform, while the current plan table separates the base-chart libraries by tier. That distinction matters: “600+” should not be read as 600 widgets on every plan. The more useful design claim is that chart points can route back to the matching trades, which makes a time, symbol, setup, risk, or exit pattern inspectable rather than decorative.

Do not judge depth by count alone. Load your own history, freeze account/date/asset filters, switch between gross and net P&L, and confirm that the same cohort follows you from summary to underlying executions.

2. Multiple Import Routes and Broad Published Coverage

The current broker directory says 250+ brokers and platforms with 70+ auto-sync connections. It separately advertises Plaid access to 3,000+ US brokers and banks. Those are different denominators: supported platforms, native or listed auto-sync connections, and Plaid institutions should not be added together or treated as identical integration depth.

The product FAQ says automatic sync normally runs once every 24 hours, usually beginning after 6 PM ET, with on-demand sync where available. It also warns that brokers limit history, so the recommended migration is a manual historical import followed by sync from the next date. Test that boundary to avoid gaps and duplicates.

3. Export and Import Management

TradesViz documents downloads for grouped trades and native executions, plus access to previous upload files. That is meaningful portability evidence. It still needs a practical exit test: download a real account and inspect whether the fields you care about—fees, tags, notes, plans, screenshots, stop context, and custom data—survive in a usable form.

4. AI Coach Is Now Broader Than Q&A

The previous review said TradesViz offered data queries but no behavioral coaching. That is obsolete. TradesViz's 2026 AI Coach page documents deterministic checks for patterns including revenge behavior and size changes after losses, with Pro receiving 16 core checks and Platinum two additional positive exit-quality checks. The pricing page also lists AI Query, Chat, Summary, Notes, Daily Insights, and Widgets.

These are vendor-documented implementation details, not independent proof that the coaching improves outcomes. Review the detector definition, active filters, sample size, comparison cohort, and cited trades. Optional generated language should summarize evidence rather than become the evidence.

5. Replay, Mobile V3, and Prop Compliance Closed Old Gaps

TradesViz now documents journal-linked Trade Replay that can step through a trade or one symbol's day second by second. Review-only mode preserves the original fills; replay-with-trading can test alternate entries or exits. Its output includes MFE, MAE, R-multiple, holding time, and exit comparisons. This is no longer a “no replay” product.

The August 2026 Mobile V3 release also moved imports, connection checks, day review, trade edits, AI Coach, and evidence drill-down into native Android and iOS apps. TradesViz is explicit that the website remains the fuller surface for the complete analytics library, custom dashboards, simulators/replay, advanced screeners, options flow, and research.

Prop Firm Compliance is another material 2026 change. The vendor says it covers 20 firms and 65 account profiles, including evaluation and funded phases, four drawdown methods, challenge simulation, and retroactive checks. Those counts and rule mappings are vendor claims; reconcile the exact firm, program, account size, phase, region, reset time, drawdown basis, and current contract before relying on any compliance alert.

4 Problems to Know Before Subscribing

1. Free Tier Is Stocks-Only for Imports

The free tier can be useful, but it does not answer a multi-asset trader's buying question. Options, futures, forex, crypto, and CFDs require a paid tier for import or sync. Treat the free account as a stock workflow test, not evidence that your non-stock history will behave the same after upgrade.

2. A General Customer API Is Not Verified

Do not buy for “open API” based on this page's legacy headline. Current public docs support broker-side API connections, imports, and exports; we did not find customer developer docs. If your workflow depends on scheduled reads, programmatic writes, webhooks, or custom dashboards outside TradesViz, documentation is a hard pre-purchase gate.

3. Imported Analytics Are Only as Complete as the Source

The product FAQ says TradesViz defaults to gross P&L and that some broker/import paths do not include commissions or fees. A beautiful expectancy curve can therefore be wrong for the question you intended to ask. Switch the active filter to net, reconcile the broker statement, and manually resolve missing costs before comparing strategies.

4. Breadth Creates Setup and Scope Risk

Hundreds of charts, custom dashboards, multiple accounts, replay, simulator tools, plans, tags, and AI surfaces create real power—and more ways to mix cohorts or misread defaults. A beginner does not need to configure everything. Start with one account, one net-P&L scope, one date window, and three questions you will act on.

What You Get at Each Tier (Feature Matrix)

This matrix records the clearest current plan boundaries. A check means the official pricing page places the capability in that plan family; it does not prove that every subfeature, market-data region, history depth, or usage limit is identical.

Pro is the natural test tier when all-asset import, more accounts, and AI review are the required jobs. Platinum is the evaluation tier for the advanced simulator, 600-stat ecosystem, custom dashboards, options flow, and broader risk/research tools. Do not infer your tier from a marketing label—mark the five exact capabilities you need on the live matrix.

TradesViz vs TraderSync vs TradeZella vs TSB

The old four-way table mixed stale prices, incomparable broker counts, and unverified feature absences. Do not carry old competitor claims into the decision. Use the dedicated TraderSync review, TradeZella review, and Tradervue review for their current fact cycles; use the broader journal shortlist when the decision is not limited to these providers. Here, the honest comparison is TradesViz against Trader's Second Brain—our product—using capabilities we could verify now.

Where TradesViz is presently stronger: documented journal-linked tape replay, native mobile apps, a very large built-in analytics surface, and a broad published auto-sync directory. Where TSB can be the better fit: a focused evidence-review system, 330 recognized trade profiles, reviewed prop-rule replay, an optional Premium Notion workspace, and a lifetime Full Access route. We do not claim the different coverage counts measure the same thing, and we do not call TSB “better” without the reader's workflow.

Common Complaints About TradesViz (and the Workarounds)

We did not treat uncited complaint volume as evidence. These are concrete friction points visible in the official plan and support documentation, paired with a test rather than a guessed severity score.

How We Evaluated TradesViz

Sources were rechecked September 22, 2026 against the official pricing matrix, general FAQ, searchable product FAQ, subscription FAQ, supported-broker directory, import guide, Mobile V3 announcement, AI Coach specification, Prop Firm Compliance announcement and Trade Replay page. Product counts, feature descriptions and prop coverage remain vendor claims unless the workflow can be reproduced with the reader's own source data.

We did not treat vendor superlatives, competitor tables, or promised performance improvement as verified comparative evidence. We also did not carry forward the old claim of hands-on free-tier testing because this cycle did not preserve a reproducible test log. “Legit” here means the product publishes coherent pricing, support, import/export, mobile, and feature documentation—not that it is regulated, suitable for every trader, or guaranteed to improve results.

Primary Sources Checked

• Pricing and feature matrix — plans, imports, account limits, chart libraries, AI tools, and trial
• General FAQ — assets, markets, apps, manual import, and platform-wide analytics count
• Product FAQ — sync cadence, custom templates, exports, gross/net P&L, fees, and history limits
• Subscription FAQ — free stock-sync boundary and trials
• Supported brokers/platforms — published platform, auto-sync, and Plaid denominators
• Mobile V3, AI Coach, Prop Firm Compliance, and Trade Replay

Who Should Use TradesViz (and Who Shouldn't)

Bottom Line: A Broad Data Journal, Not an API Promise

TradesViz now has a stronger, broader product story than the old review admitted. Its current official material documents a useful free stock tier, multi-asset paid imports, deep analytics, AI-assisted review, journal-linked replay, native mobile apps, export controls, simulator and research tools, and prop-firm compliance. The former “no AI coaching, no replay, no prop tracking” verdict is withdrawn.

The API boundary matters: we cannot recommend TradesViz specifically for a general open customer API on the current public evidence. Developers should require docs before purchase. Every trader should test the exact source, net costs, sync cadence, history continuity, and plan entitlement on their own evidence.

Vendor features, prices, connection coverage, and prop rules can change. A journal organizes evidence; it does not guarantee trading performance.