- You can stay inside the Free plan's current grouped-trade quota while evaluating
- Your broker or platform appears in the current import directory
- You want automatically generated charts, tags, filters, and cohort reports
- You and a paid mentor need read-only access and private trade comments
- You need simulator-style candle replay rather than post-trade price charts
- You require a documented AI coach or native iOS/Android workflow
- You have multiple accounts but have not tested account tags and trade grouping
- You need free CSV export or verified support for a specific non-equity workflow
Tradervue Pricing: Free, Silver, and Gold Explained
As of September 22, 2026, Tradervue's public pricing page lists Silver at $29.95 per month and Gold at $49.95 per month. The site also offers a Free signup route, and its cancellation guide says a subscriber can move back to the Free plan at the end of the current billing period. The Silver and Gold signup pages currently specify a seven-day trial and automatic billing unless the user returns to Free before it ends.
| Plan | Published price | Clearest documented boundary | What to verify | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 30 grouped trade imports per calendar month | Exact asset, broker, reports, sharing, and export entitlements | Sep 7, 2026 |
| Silver | $29.95/month | Unlimited imports, accounts, mentors/mentees, broker sync, advanced reporting | Trial terms, tax, renewal, history depth, and required reports | Sep 7, 2026 |
| Gold | $49.95/month | Silver workflow plus exit analysis, max-potential P&L, and commissions/fees support | Eligibility by asset, data completeness, and exact checkout terms | Sep 7, 2026 |
These are current public monthly prices, not a promise about future renewal, tax, currency conversion, discounts or entitlements. The public page displays monthly rates; we did not locate a separate annual rate or public annual discount on that page. Confirm the current official pricing and feature matrix before paying.
Is Tradervue Free? Yes, With a 30-Trade Import Quota
Yes. Tradervue has an ongoing Free plan, not merely a paid-plan trial. The current dedicated quota article says Free users can import 30 trades per calendar month. Tradervue groups executions into logical trades, so the unit is not a fill: many executions can collapse into one grouped trade. The quota counts trades when they are imported, not when they occurred.
If a file would exceed the quota, Tradervue says it sorts the file by symbol and then date before importing what fits. That creates a practical review risk: a partial import may not be a clean chronological slice. The help article recommends smaller date-based chunks; it also says the remaining trades can be imported after upgrading or when a new calendar month begins.
A legacy FAQ visible during this check still refers to a 100-trade Free limit, but its link resolves to the newer quota article that says 30. We use the dedicated current article for the operational number and record the contradiction rather than averaging the two. If the limit decides your workflow, verify it inside the account before a large import.
Does Free support futures, forex, and options?
Tradervue supports equities, futures, options, and forex at the product level. Its FAQ explicitly says a Silver or Gold subscription is required for futures. The current paid pricing matrix lists futures, forex, and options, but it does not show a complete Free column. We therefore cannot turn the old “Free is stocks/ETFs only” line into a verified blanket statement for every non-equity product. Futures-on-Free is documented as unavailable; Free entitlement for a specific forex or options importer should be tested or confirmed with support.
The sensible use of Free is a controlled import trial, not an assumption that a green signup button proves every workflow. If you need a broader survey before committing, compare the current trading-journal workflows and evidence gates rather than choosing by “free” alone.
Brokers, Imports, Sync, and the Grouping Test
Tradervue publishes a searchable directory covering a wide variety of brokers and platforms across stocks/ETFs, futures, options, and forex. The table identifies which routes include commissions, liquidity data, or automation. It also lists a Generic Importer for all four asset families. That is better decision evidence than an old rounded claim such as “80+ integrations,” because a count cannot tell you whether your broker, asset, fields, and automation path work.
There are two operational routes. Standard Import means exporting a CSV or Excel-style file from the broker and uploading it periodically. Broker Sync connects through an available broker API route and retrieves data automatically. Tradervue warns that sync is not available for every listed broker, so a supported manual importer does not imply an automated connection.
| Import check | Why it matters | Pass evidence | Failure response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exact source route | Manual support and Broker Sync are different capabilities | Your exact broker/platform row and import instructions | Use the generic format or keep the current journal |
| Execution grouping | The quota and reports operate on logical trades | Scale-ins, partial exits, reversals, and repeated symbols group as intended | Adjust grouping or split/merge before analysis |
| Account separation | Same-symbol executions can merge across accounts | A stable account tag is applied on every import | Stop the full migration and repair account tags |
| Net results | Some source files omit commissions and fees | Trade and period totals reconcile to broker statements | Configure estimates or choose a richer source |
| Timezone and session | Day/time reports depend on correctly placed executions | Boundary trades land on the intended session and date | Correct source/settings before drawing conclusions |
Multiple-account traders should pay special attention to account tags. Tradervue's help center says that without them, the platform normally maintains one open position per underlying symbol and can merge new executions into an existing trade. Account tags—which require Silver or Gold—separate accounts and strategies when used consistently. This is a material workflow rule, not a cosmetic label.
Check your source on Tradervue's current supported-platform directory. For a separate migration-focused verdict, see the Tradervue alternative guide after its own current fact cycle.
Reports and Charts: Tradervue's Best-Documented Strength
Tradervue's public material is clearest about conventional review. It documents automatically generated price charts on multiple timeframes with entries and exits marked, tagging and filtering, overview and detailed reports, a dashboard, and reports organized by day/time, price/volume, instrument, market behavior, win/loss/expectation, and liquidity.
The Compare report can place two cohorts side by side—for example winners versus losers, long versus short, one period versus another, or two custom filters. That is useful when the question is causal enough to test: “Did this setup improve after a rule change?” is stronger than scanning a dashboard for whichever number looks interesting. For the arithmetic behind the result, use the expectancy formula and sample-size checks alongside the report.
MFE/MAE and exit analysis are not the same feature
The current MFE/MAE article says Silver and Gold subscribers can see position and price MFE/MAE statistics and related reports. That corrects the former Gold-only claim. Tradervue's separate Exit Analysis is documented for Gold and for stock, futures, and forex trades. It moves the last exit within defined time and risk constraints to estimate a better-exit P&L and an efficiency measure. It is a counterfactual analysis, not evidence that the alternative fill was achievable in live execution.
Gold also documents commission and fee support. If the source includes commissions, Tradervue can import them; otherwise a user can set per-share or per-contract estimates. Reports can then switch between gross and net P&L. A verified importer row does not guarantee every cost field is present, so statement reconciliation remains mandatory.
Trade sharing and mentor access
Tradervue supports public or link-based trade sharing and a paid mentoring workflow. Its current mentoring guide says both mentor and mentee need Silver or Gold. The mentor receives read-only access to the mentee's Trades, Journal, and Reports, can view quantities and P&L, and can leave private comments, but cannot edit the data. That is a specific collaboration strength for an existing coaching relationship.
It is also a privacy decision. Tradervue's FAQ says ordinary shared trades hide P&L and share quantity by default, while paid users may opt to include P&L. Mentor access is broader. Before inviting anyone, verify what the recipient can see with a test account or a non-sensitive trade and remove access when the review relationship ends.
AI, Trade Replay, and Mobile App: What Is Actually Verified?
The old review said Tradervue had “zero AI,” “no replay,” and “no native mobile app.” Those are absolute claims about a changing product. In this cycle, we searched the current official pricing page, feature navigation, help-center categories, reports documentation, chart pages, and public broker/import material. We did not find an official AI-coach specification, a simulator-style chronological replay product, or an App Store/Google Play/native-app page.
| Capability | What official material does show | Review status | Pre-purchase proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI coach or generated insights | No dedicated current specification found in reviewed official pages | Not verified | Feature page, plan entitlement, inputs, cited trades, and reproducible output |
| Post-trade price charts | Automatic multi-timeframe charts and interactive TradingView charts with markers | Verified category | Your symbol, session, timeframe, corporate-action handling, and marker accuracy |
| Simulator-style replay | No chronological forward-stepping simulator page found | Not verified | Replay controls, market-data scope, speed, order simulation, and plan entitlement |
| Native mobile app | No official iOS/Android store or native-app page found in reviewed materials | Not verified | Current official store listing and completion of your real phone workflow |
| Browser use on mobile | Not established by a native-app absence search | Test required | Import, annotate, filter, review, export, and cancel on your device |
Not verified does not mean “does not exist.” It means this review will not make the capability part of a buying recommendation without current primary evidence. If visual simulation is central, compare Tradervue's chart-review workflow with the documented replay products in the current TradeZella review and TraderSync review; each competitor still needs its own exact-plan verification.
What You Get at Each Tier (Evidence Matrix)
This matrix includes only boundaries supported by current public documentation. “Not established” is deliberate: Tradervue's current marketing pricing table compares Silver and Gold but omits a complete Free feature column, while some legacy help copy has not been synchronized with newer quota documentation.
| Capability | Free | Silver | Gold | Decision note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade imports | 30 grouped trades/calendar month | Unlimited listed | Unlimited listed | The unit is grouped trades, not executions |
| Futures | Paid plan required per FAQ | Supported | Supported | Confirm the exact source and contract |
| Forex and options on Free | Not established in current Free matrix | Supported at product/paid-plan level | Supported at product/paid-plan level | Test the exact importer and entitlement |
| Broker Sync | Not established | Advertised | Advertised | Only selected broker routes are automated |
| Account tags / multiple accounts | Not included in current help article | Available | Available | Use consistently to prevent cross-account merging |
| MFE/MAE statistics | Not documented | Available | Available | Current help article explicitly names both paid tiers |
| CSV trade export | Not available per export guide | Available | Available | Test field completeness before migration |
| Mentor workflow | Both parties need paid plans | Available | Available | Mentor can view broad account data but not edit |
| Exit analysis | Not documented | Not documented | Available for listed assets | Counterfactual last-exit analysis has stated risk constraints |
| Commission/fee support | Not documented | Not documented | Available | Completeness still depends on source data or estimates |
Silver is the logical trial when the current Free quota, futures gate, account separation, export, or mentor workflow blocks your evaluation. Gold becomes relevant when the documented exit-analysis and commission/fee workflow are required. Neither label proves the journal will improve results; the value comes from a repeated decision loop using reconciled data.
Tradervue vs Trader's Second Brain: An Honest Alternative
Disclosure: this site makes Trader's Second Brain (TSB). Tradervue has the stronger documented case here for conventional report breadth, automatic post-trade charts, public trade sharing, and a two-person mentor workflow. TSB is a different fit when the reader wants a focused evidence-review loop, broader recognized import-format coverage, prop-rule tracking, and a lifetime-access option. It is not honest to convert those different strengths into one context-free score.
| Reader job | Tradervue | TSB Full Access | Decision boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Import coverage | Published broker/platform directory, generic importer, and selected Broker Sync routes | Recognized import profiles plus supported sync routes | Directory entries and recognized format profiles are not equivalent; reconcile one exact export |
| Core review | Charts, tags, filters, detailed reports, cohort comparison, and mentor comments | Journal, reports, Leak Map, setup review, backtester, and AI Coach | Choose by the weekly decision you will actually repeat |
| Prop workflow | No exact prop-rule tracker established in reviewed official pages | Prop Firm Challenge Tracker tied to imported history and reviewed program rules | The firm's current dashboard and contract remain authoritative |
| Mentor collaboration | Read-only mentor access and private trade comments documented for paid users | Not presented here as the same two-account mentor workflow | Tradervue is the clearer fit when an external mentor needs direct account access |
| Replay | Post-trade price charts verified; simulator-style replay Not verified | Reviews and backtests imported personal history; not manual candle-by-candle replay | Use a dedicated replay product if forward-stepping simulation is mandatory |
| Ownership route | Free plus recurring Silver/Gold subscriptions | Lifetime-access option plus a separate monthly route | Cost structure matters only after import and workflow fit are proven |
TSB currently supports 330 recognized trade profiles. It counts recognized import profiles, not guaranteed perfect imports, and is not directly comparable to Tradervue's platform directory. The Prop Firm Challenge Tracker does not replace a firm's contract, approve payouts, or guarantee compliance. The lifetime-access option does not make TSB universally better; it changes the ownership trade-off for a reader whose source and review workflow fit.
A Four-Week Test Before You Commit
A journal should earn its place by changing a repeated decision. A feature-tour account can look impressive while leaving the trader's process untouched. Use one representative account and one question for four weeks; do not import the entire archive until the data model passes.
| Week | Test | Evidence to save | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · Import | Load a small sample with scale-ins, partial exits, repeated symbols, fees, and a session boundary | Broker statement, source file, import log, and reconciliation sheet | Unexplained differences in quantity, price, time, fees, or grouping |
| 2 · Review | Answer one question with tags, filters, charts, and a named cohort | Saved filter definition, sample size, report, and underlying trades | The report cannot be traced back to executions |
| 3 · Action | Create one measurable rule and apply it prospectively | Rule text, eligible trades, exceptions, and adherence result | The insight cannot produce an observable behavior change |
| 4 · Exit | Export your trades, downgrade/cancel path, and restore the analysis elsewhere | CSV, field inventory, missing-data list, and cancellation screenshot | Your required data or workflow is not portable |
Paid CSV export is a real portability control, but it does not automatically include every note, tag, image, report definition, or relationship you may care about. Inspect the actual file. Keep the original broker statements as the independent source of truth, and keep a non-overlapping cutoff date if you move to another journal.
How We Evaluated Tradervue
Sources were rechecked September 22, 2026 against Tradervue's pricing page, Free quota article, supported-platform directory, Standard Import and Broker Sync guides, generic format, product FAQ, reports, MFE/MAE, exit analysis, commissions and fees, multiple accounts, mentoring, export, cancellation, past-trade chart, terms and privacy pages. Official documentation supports the features and policies stated here; it does not prove future sync reliability, uptime, support quality, data safety or trading improvement.
The review did not use a production Tradervue account or upload private broker data. It therefore does not claim hands-on proof of importer accuracy, service uptime, support quality, mobile usability, or outcome improvement. “Worth testing” means the public evidence is coherent enough for a reversible sample test—not that the vendor, product, or trader result is guaranteed.
Primary Sources Checked
- Pricing and paid-plan matrix — current Silver and Gold amounts, headline entitlements, storage, and trial availability
- Trade Import Quota — current Free quota, grouped-trade unit, partial imports, and paid unlimited imports
- Supported Brokers and Platforms — exact source/asset matrix, automation markers, and Generic Importer
- Standard Import versus Broker Sync and Generic Import Format
- Reports summary, MFE/MAE, and Exit Analysis
- Multiple accounts, Mentoring, and CSV export
- Past-trade charts, cancel/downgrade flow, and Privacy Policy updated June 5, 2026
Who Should Use Tradervue (and Who Shouldn't)
Bottom Line: Free Is a Useful Test; Paid Value Depends on the Workflow
Tradervue remains a credible conventional trading journal, and the Free plan is a practical way to test it. Its best-supported strengths are broker/file import routes, automatic post-trade charts, tags and filters, detailed and comparison reports, paid multi-account separation, and mentor collaboration. The current 30-grouped-trade quota is narrow, but enough for a carefully chosen sample.
The paid tiers are not automatically poor value, and the headline should not be read as a current universal verdict. Silver can solve import volume, account separation, reporting, export, and mentor needs; Gold adds documented exit and cost analysis. They become poor value for a particular reader when the exact importer fails, the required feature is undocumented, or four weeks of use do not change a decision.
Decision in one minute:
- Light-volume equity trader: start with Free and reconcile every field in a representative sample.
- Futures or multi-account trader: test Silver's exact importer and account tags before moving history.
- Trader needing exit efficiency and net-cost reporting: verify Gold with source data that includes the required fields.
- Trader with a coach: Tradervue has a documented read-only mentor workflow, but verify visibility boundaries first.
- Trader requiring AI, simulator replay, or native mobile: treat those as procurement gates until Tradervue supplies current official proof.
- Trader prioritizing import-format breadth, prop-rule tracking, and lifetime access: test TSB alongside it without assuming either importer will reconcile perfectly.
Pricing, plan entitlements, import routes, and product features can change. A journal organizes evidence; it does not guarantee trading performance.
