Compare the split against payout caps and account-stage restrictions.
Prop firm profit split comparison.
Profit split is the most marketable number on a prop firm offer, but it is not the full economics. A lower split with cleaner payout rules can be better than a headline 100% split with tight caps.
Some firms increase split after milestones; others advertise first-bucket exceptions.
The real number is what can be withdrawn under your strategy and country.
Program rows matched to this rule topic.
Rows with source URLs or official/help snapshots.
Relevant markets in the current TSB registry.
Firms to check for profit split comparison
Rows are sorted by source coverage first, then TSB Fit Score. Always verify the official checkout before paying.
| Firm | Program | Account | Daily loss | Max loss / drawdown | Payout / split | Source status | What to verify | Decision links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTMO | 2-Step FTMO Challenge | $100K | 5% | 10% static / Static max loss | Up to 90% Reward request after funded-stage rules |
Official/source page | FTMO 2-Step keeps familiar 10/5 targets and static 10% maximum loss, but the 5% daily loss and 4 minimum trading days per phase still decide trader fit. | |
| FundedNext | Stellar 2-Step | $100K | 5% | 10% / Static max loss | 80%, then scale-up to 90% context First reward 21 days, then 14-day cadence |
Official/source page | Stellar 2-Step is the cleaner current FundedNext row: lower phase-one target than classic 10/5 firms, but the same 5% daily and 10% overall loss pressure. | |
| Apex Trader Funding | Legacy Full Evaluation | $50K Legacy benchmark | No daily max drawdown | $2.5K trailing threshold / Intraday trailing threshold | 100% first payout bucket, then split PA payout-window based |
Official/source page | Apex Legacy is ready for futures comparison: 50K, 3K goal, no daily max drawdown, 2.5K trailing threshold, and 7-day minimum context. | |
| Apex Trader Funding | WealthCharts 50K Full | $50K WealthCharts benchmark | None | $2.5K trailing threshold / Full trailing threshold with WealthCharts platform-specific pricing | PA split after first payout bucket PA payout-window based |
Official/source page | The WealthCharts Apex row is ready enough for platform-specific comparison: 50K, 3K goal, no daily loss, 2.5K trailing threshold, and pricing context. | |
| Topstep | Trading Combine | $50K Combine benchmark | Optional $1K DLL at checkout | $2K MLL / End-of-day trailing MLL with optional DLL and consistency objective | 90/10 XFA payout-path rules |
Official/source page | Topstep is ready for futures comparison: 50K Combine, 2K MLL, optional DLL, 50% consistency objective, and 90/10 payout split context. | |
| Alpha Capital | Alpha Swing | $100K Alpha Swing benchmark | 5% | 10% static / Swing-friendly static drawdown with weekend holds allowed at every stage | Up to 80% On-demand performance-fee requests for Alpha Swing |
Official/source page | Alpha Swing is one of the cleaner source-backed rows: 10/5 targets, 5% daily loss, 10% static drawdown, 3 minimum days per phase, and up-to-80% performance split. | |
| Alpha Futures | 150K evaluation benchmark | $150K futures benchmark | No daily loss guard | $4,500 max drawdown / No daily loss guard; 50% consistency rule during evaluation | Qualified-stage payout rules Qualified-stage payout rules after evaluation |
Official/source page | Alpha Futures is a concrete futures comparison row now: 150K, 9K target, 4.5K max drawdown, no daily loss guard, and benchmark monthly/activation economics. | |
| BEM Funding | BEM Extended Challenge | Up to $100K | 4% | 8% / Two-phase evaluation with minimum profitable trading requirement | Payout split by BEM account route Weekly payout positioning on public homepage |
Official/source page | BEM Funding is ready as a source-backed 2-step benchmark: 10/5 targets, 4% daily loss, 8% max loss, and weekly payout positioning. | |
| BrightFunded | 2-Step Bright | $100K Bright benchmark | 4% | 8% static / Static drawdown with lower daily-loss profile | Funded split by selected account path; 15% evaluation-profit share context Funded reward cycle after payout criteria; evaluation share credited on first funded payout |
Official/source page | BrightFunded is not empty coverage anymore: use it as a two-step static-drawdown row, but keep checkout price and funded split as verification items. | |
| Crypto Fund Trader | Standard 2-Phase Evaluation | $100K crypto benchmark | 5% | 10% static / Static drawdown; paid add-ons can alter daily/max limits | 80% base / 90% add-on Fast scholarship reward processing context |
Official/source page | Crypto Fund Trader has enough concrete data for crypto filters: 8/4 targets, 5% daily, 10% max, 80%-90% split context, and a 100K fee benchmark. | |
| DayTraders | 150K Trail benchmark | $150K | No daily loss limit | $4,500 intraday trailing drawdown / Intraday trailing drawdown; Pro activation after pass | 100% simulated profit split on Pro Payout after 8 qualifying days in Pro account |
Official/source page | DayTraders has attractive futures economics, but the intraday trail and consistency rule should be visible before any offer or ranking push. | |
| E8 Crypto | E8 One Crypto-capable benchmark | $100K benchmark; $5K-$500K custom range | 3% | 4% dynamic drawdown / Dynamic drawdown based on highest closed balance; locks at initial balance | Up to 100% Payout after performance requirements |
Official/source page | E8 Crypto should remain tied to E8 Markets authority but filtered separately because market selection, payout option, and dynamic drawdown change the trader fit. | |
| E8 Futures | E8 Signature Futures 150K | $150K | $3,000 daily pause in performance stage | $4,500 EOD dynamic drawdown / EOD dynamic drawdown in challenge; soft daily pause in performance stage | 80% Payout after performance requirements |
Official/source page | E8 Futures is a clean 6% futures benchmark with EOD dynamic drawdown, but daily-pause language is performance-stage specific and should not be confused with an evaluation breach. | |
| Earn2Trade | Gauntlet Mini | $100K | $2,200 daily loss | $3,500 trailing drawdown / Futures progression ladder with daily loss and trailing drawdown | 80% Weekly payout style |
Official/source page | Earn2Trade Gauntlet Mini is ready for comparison: 100K, 6K target, 2.2K daily loss, 3.5K trailing drawdown, minimum 10 days, and 80% split. | |
| FXIFY | 2-Phase Pro | $100K 2-Phase Pro benchmark | 4% | 8% static / Static drawdown; unusual target order should be checked against selected challenge | Up to 90% promo split context Funded payout cycle by FXIFY account rules |
Official/source page | FXIFY 2-Phase Pro is source-backed enough for comparison: 4/8 target structure, 4% daily loss, 8% static max loss, and live 2-Phase Pro promo context. | |
| Fintokei | ProTrader | $100K benchmark ($10K-$400K range) | 5% | 10% / Static daily and maximum loss limits; 3% max open-trade risk | 80% initial ProTrader performance reward Instant payouts after funded performance reward rules |
Official/source page | ProTrader is the clean FTMO-style Fintokei row. Keep SwiftTrader and StartTrader separate because loss limits, targets, and account economics differ. | |
| Funded Futures Family | 150K EOD benchmark | $150K EOD benchmark | No daily loss limit | $4,000 eval / $4,500 funded EOD drawdown / End-of-day trailing drawdown; no DLL; payout days require minimum profitable days | Funded payout share by selected account rules 5 trading days to payout on benchmark family row |
Official/source page | Funded Futures Family is no longer an empty row: 150K benchmark, 9K target, no DLL, EOD drawdown, payout-day requirement, list price, and reset price are mapped. | |
| Funded Trader Markets | 2-Step Plus 100K benchmark | $100K | 4% | 10% / Balance-based daily drawdown and balance-based overall drawdown | 70% On-demand reward cycle |
Official/source page | FTM should not be treated as only instant funding. The 2-Step Plus benchmark is cleaner for rules comparison, while instant rows need their own add-on and drawdown pass. |
How to read this rule
Profit split tells you the percentage of funded-stage profit a trader may receive, but it does not tell you when, how much, or under which conditions.
TSB compares profit split next to payout cadence, KYC, challenge rules, max loss, and commercial status so the page does not become a thin coupon table.
Before checkout, verify
- Is the split the same in evaluation, funded, and scaled stages?
- Are there first-payout caps or first-bucket exceptions?
- Does the split require add-ons, milestones, or a higher-priced account?
- What happens after a rule breach, reset, or account scale-up?
Where this rule connects next
Use these paths to move from the rule explanation into rankings, payout checks, challenge rows, and adjacent rule problems.
Profit split comparison questions
Is a 100% profit split always best?
No. A 100% headline can be limited by caps, buffers, rules, or short-term promotional terms. Compare it with withdrawal requirements.
Why does TSB show payout timing beside split?
Because split only matters after withdrawal eligibility. Timing and restrictions often decide the real value more than the headline percentage.