Begin with the free plan and run the same ten-trade sample you would use elsewhere. Intermediate is the first serious candidate for retained replay work and prop-rule practice; Pro is required when seconds-level data, futures, or the highest limits matter. FX Replay now also imports real trades into a paid Live Journal, so it is no longer accurate to call the product “not a journal.” The two journals remain separate, and a simulator still cannot prove live profitability or execution quality.
The Short Answer
FX Replay is a focused browser workflow for stepping through hidden historical data, placing simulated trades, and reviewing the resulting session. It is a sensible shortlist candidate for discretionary forex and futures traders, but “best” depends on the exact symbol, historical depth, order behavior, retention, export, and device performance you need.
The product now covers two different evidence loops. The Backtesting Journal records simulated replay work. The paid Live Journal can synchronize MT4/MT5, cTrader, and TradeLocker accounts and accept supported reports or CSV files from platforms such as Tradovate and NinjaTrader. FX Replay says the two journals coexist, but their entries do not automatically move between them and their analytics are not combined.
That changes the buying question. Do not ask only whether FX Replay can replay candles. Ask which output you need: a retained manual-test record, a prop-rule rehearsal, an imported-live-trade review, or all three. If you are still designing the rule set itself, use the strategy backtesting workflow before interpreting any simulated result.
FX Replay Pricing
As of September 2026, FX Replay listed Beginner at $0, Intermediate at $17.99 monthly or $180 yearly, and Pro at $35 monthly or $350 yearly. The annual totals equal about $15 and $29.16 per month before tax, but the annual charge is paid as a lump sum. These prices were rechecked September 22, 2026; verify the checkout total, currency, tax, renewal date and current promotion before paying.
| Plan | Price snapshot | Replay allowance | Data and workspace | Who should test it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginner | $0; permanent free plan | 2 sessions, 50 records per session, one-week retention, one-month maximum session span | 1 indicator, standard data, no multichart | A first workflow and compatibility check |
| Intermediate | $17.99 monthly or $180 yearly | 10 sessions, 200 records per session, six-month retention | 3 indicators, 2 charts, standard data, limited AI, prop simulator | Regular manual practice without Pro-only market/data needs |
| Pro | $35 monthly or $350 yearly | Unlimited sessions, records, and retention under the published matrix | Unlimited charts/indicators, expanded data, custom timeframes, futures, seconds intervals, prop simulator | Futures users and workflows that require seconds data or the highest limits |
Is the free FX Replay plan usable?
Yes—for evaluating the interface and one small protocol. Two sessions and 50 records per session can reveal whether chart navigation, order entry, notes, and review feel workable. One-week retention makes it unsuitable as a durable research archive. Treat it as a real but narrow plan, not as “unlimited free backtesting” and not merely as a landing-page demo.
The five-day trial has an official-source conflict
The pricing page advertised paid-plan trials with no credit card required. A current help article about the five-day trial instructed users to enter payment details and said the subscription starts automatically when the trial ends unless it is cancelled. Both are official FX Replay sources. Because they disagree, the honest answer is Not verified until the actual signup screen is inspected. Save the displayed trial end, renewal amount, and cancellation confirmation.
FX Replay’s refund article says subscription payments are generally nonrefundable, including unused time and trial conversions, subject to narrow exceptions. Annual plans renew automatically unless cancelled. That makes the checkout and renewal disclosure more important than any monthly equivalent shown in a comparison table.
What FX Replay Actually Does
At its core, FX Replay lets you choose historical data, reveal it progressively, place simulated trades, and analyze the session without exposing future candles. The value is not “seeing the past”; any chart can do that. The value is a repeatable workflow in which the next decision is made before the next bar is known.
Market Replay
A backtesting session combines charts, simulated orders, account settings, notes, and results. FX Replay documents support for multiple assets in one session, with up to five assets at once. The plan matrix controls the number of sessions, records, charts, indicators, retained history, and data access. Before subscribing, confirm the exact instrument, provider, time zone, first available date, spread, commission, and interval you intend to test.
TradingView-Based Charting
The interface uses familiar TradingView-style charting, but custom indicators are not portable by assumption. FX Replay documents its own FXR Script. A TradingView Pine Script indicator must be rewritten rather than pasted in unchanged. If a private indicator is central to your method, reproduce one output on the same symbol and timestamp before migrating a test archive.
Prop Firm Simulator
The simulator can apply a profit target, maximum daily loss, and maximum total loss to a replay session. Current documentation places it on Intermediate and Pro, correcting the old Pro-only statement. Inside a Prop Firm Session, FX Replay says the price-skip control cannot rewind, which helps preserve a one-way test.
A configurable simulator does not prove parity with a named funding program. Confirm the exact firm, program, phase, region, account size, loss basis, reset time, consistency rule, minimum days, payout terms, prohibited conduct, and current change date. The prop-firm rule verification checklist shows which fields must be checked before practice results are treated as relevant.
Built-in Journal and Analytics
FX Replay now documents both a Backtesting Journal and a Live Journal. Direct live-account synchronization currently covers MT4/MT5, cTrader, and TradeLocker, while supported report or CSV imports include examples such as Tradovate and NinjaTrader. Multiple trading accounts can be connected, and disconnecting an account does not remove already imported entries.
The boundary matters: backtesting and live entries do not automatically transfer between the two journals, and their analytics are not combined. A trader who wants one cross-environment dataset should test export, identifiers, corrections, fees, partial fills, time zones, and deduplication—not infer one database from two tabs.
Mentor AI
FX Replay positions Mentor AI primarily inside the backtesting workflow. Its public page describes live-trading expansion as a future direction, so this review does not claim that AI analysis spans every imported live account or replaces a human audit. Treat each suggestion as a hypothesis against the underlying trade sample, not as evidence that a strategy works.
Markets, futures, and seconds data
FX Replay’s futures guide puts futures access on Pro and gives examples across major equity-index and commodity contracts, with documented history starting January 3, 2012 for the cited set. Its seconds-timeframe guide says Pro can reach one-second futures intervals and five-second forex-CFD intervals. “Seconds data” therefore does not mean one-second resolution for every market.
What FX Replay Does Well
The strongest case for FX Replay is workflow cohesion, not a universal performance claim. It can keep historical replay, simulated execution, session notes, analytics, and configurable prop limits in one browser process. That reduces the manual stitching required when charts, a spreadsheet, and a rule calculator are separate.
- A low-risk product test. The permanent free plan can validate basic compatibility before a paid trial or subscription.
- Clear practice constraints. Intermediate and Pro can place target and loss limits around a session, which is more useful than replay with no account rule context.
- Multi-asset context. Up to five assets lets a trader observe correlated markets without pretending each trade occurred in isolation.
- Practice and live review under one vendor. The Live Journal closes a real gap in the old product description, even though the two journal datasets remain separate.
- Explicit plan matrix. Session, retention, indicator, chart, AI, market, and data boundaries are visible enough to map a workflow before checkout.
These are capability strengths. This editorial pass did not run controlled latency, uptime, fill-quality, or data-completeness measurements, so it does not turn them into “fastest,” “most accurate,” or “best” claims.
Where FX Replay Falls Short
1. Manual replay is not automated strategy testing
FX Replay is built for discretionary interaction. This fact-cycle found no official path for importing an Expert Advisor or running a coded strategy optimizer. If the method is executable code, compare a proper strategy tester rather than asking a manual simulator to approximate it. Human replay also introduces choice, attention, and hindsight effects that code does not remove by itself.
2. Important capabilities sit behind plan gates
The free plan has short retention and small session limits. Intermediate expands the usable workspace, but futures, seconds intervals, custom timeframes, and the highest limits are Pro territory. Buy for the binding requirement—exact market and data—not for a generic “advanced” label.
3. Backtesting and Live Journal evidence stays split
Adding the Live Journal is a meaningful improvement, but FX Replay explicitly says live and backtesting entries do not move automatically and analytics do not combine. A strategy-research result and actual execution record can therefore live in adjacent systems without a shared statistic. Define how you will connect them before expecting an end-to-end feedback loop.
4. Pine Script is not FXR Script
A TradingView-like interface does not make custom-code compatibility automatic. Rewriting an indicator can change calculations, session boundaries, or missing-data behavior. Validate several timestamps and outputs before assuming two implementations are equivalent.
5. Native desktop app status is Not verified
The official workflow routes users to the web application, and this review found no official native desktop download. That supports calling the current route browser-based; it does not justify the absolute claim that no desktop client exists anywhere. If offline use, local storage, or a native installer is mandatory, obtain a current official answer before buying.
6. Replay results are hypothetical
Historical simulation does not represent actual trading and cannot fully reproduce liquidity, slippage, market impact, connection failures, or whether a trader will follow the rule under live loss. Do not convert a pass certificate, favorable backtest, or smooth replay fill into a profitability promise. The output is practice evidence with known limits.
FX Replay vs Alternatives
For the high-intent comparison, FX Replay and TradingView now overlap more than the old article admitted. TradingView’s Replay Trading can configure capital, currency, and commission; place market, limit, stop, and stop-limit orders; show P&L and reports; and export results. TradingView also says the overall replay-trading result is session-bound rather than saved as a durable journal record.
| Decision field | FX Replay | TradingView Replay Trading | Test before choosing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Dedicated manual replay and backtesting sessions | Replay inside a broader charting platform | Which interface produces a complete, repeatable session record? |
| Simulated orders | Session order placement and management | Market, limit, stop, and stop-limit orders documented | Order behavior, commission, spread, partial exits, and failure cases |
| Saved evidence | Backtesting Journal with plan-dependent retention | Trade data and overall result available during the session; export before exit | Restore, export, screenshots, notes, and audit trail |
| Historical depth | Varies by market, plan, and interval | Varies by symbol, interval, and plan; daily history differs from intraday allowances | Exact symbol, first usable date, provider, gaps, and time zone |
| Custom indicators | FXR Script; Pine code must be rewritten | Pine Script ecosystem | Output parity on the same bars |
| Prop-rule session | Configurable simulator on Intermediate and Pro | No equivalent rule-enforcement feature verified in this review | Exact program mechanics, not just target percentages |
| Live-trade journal | Paid Live Journal with documented sync/import routes | Not presented as the same durable imported-trade journal job | Your broker, fields, fees, corrections, and export |
Choose FX Replay when a dedicated retained replay protocol or configurable prop session is central. Choose TradingView when replay is occasional and charting, Pine, alerts, and the broader platform already anchor your workflow. See the TradingView vs NinjaTrader workflow comparison if the decision also involves native trading-platform functions.
Forex Tester, TradeZella, and MetaTrader solve other variants of the job: browser or offline simulation, journal-first manual backtesting, and coded strategy testing. The FX Replay alternatives guide compares those routes without pretending they share one universal rank.
What Real Users Say
The old review quoted a changing Trustpilot score, compared it with unrelated journal scores, and called lag the number-one complaint without preserving a reproducible review sample. Those statements are removed. A live aggregate can change, and self-selected reviews cannot establish relative speed or reliability across devices.
Recent reviews can still generate test questions. If users mention slow loading, lost work, billing, support, or imports, reproduce the issue under a documented setup: browser and version, device, connection, symbol, date range, chart count, session length, import file, and plan. Record whether autosave, export, cancellation, and support recovery work. That turns anecdote into a useful acceptance test without presenting it as a measured product rate.
No controlled uptime, latency, crash-rate, fill-accuracy, support-response, or user-sentiment study was performed. Those values remain Not verified. The verdict rests on documented capabilities, constraints, and a reader-run evaluation protocol.
The Ideal Workflow: FX Replay + a Trading Journal
The old workflow jumped from a successful replay to “trade live with confidence that the strategy works.” That is too strong. A safer loop preserves the separation between designed rules, hypothetical replay evidence, simulation, and actual fills.
- Specify: write the eligible setup, disqualifiers, risk logic, costs, market, interval, and invalidation rule before revealing future data.
- Replay: use a pre-committed sample and record every eligible signal, including skipped and losing trades.
- Audit: verify timestamps, spread, commission, order behavior, missing data, and any manual overrides.
- Forward-test: keep simulated or smallest-permitted live evidence distinct from the historical sample.
- Review: compare planned behavior with actual execution and change one versioned rule only after a defined evidence gate.
The trading-journal comparison is useful if imported fills, tagging, analytics, or cross-account review—not historical replay—is the binding job.
Where Trader’s Second Brain fits honestly
Trader’s Second Brain is our product. It is not a manual candle-by-candle replacement for FX Replay. Its different strength is reviewing actual trade history across the supported broker and platform formats shown above, then checking execution patterns and prop-rule exposure with the Prop Firm Challenge Tracker. FX Replay now has its own paid Live Journal, so the choice should be tested on your exact source, fields, reconciliation, analytics, and ownership preference—not framed as “FX Replay has no real-trade journal.”
If you want to test that adjacent workflow, first verify your exact export or connection in the live TSB import directory. Full Access offers lifetime or monthly access; the current public amount is $299 lifetime or $49/month.
Run This Ten-Trade Test Before You Pay
Use the same instrument, dates, session, setup, spread, commission, and ten eligible trades in every shortlisted tool. Ten trades cannot validate an edge; they can expose workflow incompatibility before a subscription renews.
| Checkpoint | Pass condition | Evidence to save |
|---|---|---|
| Market/data | Exact symbol, provider, time zone, date, interval, and session are available | Settings screenshot and first/last timestamp |
| Orders/costs | Required order types, spread, commission, size, stops, and partial exits behave as expected | One winning and one losing order audit |
| Blindness | Future bars and indicators are not accidentally exposed | Session-start protocol and any skip/rewind controls |
| Persistence | Close, reopen, and recover the session without silent loss | Before/after record count and restore timestamp |
| Journal/export | Required notes, tags, screenshots, metrics, and export survive | Export file and field map |
| Prop rules | Exact daily/max-loss basis and reset behavior match the intended program | Rule configuration and boundary-case result |
| Live import | Fills, fees, partials, corrections, and duplicates reconcile for your source | Broker total versus journal total |
| Exit/billing | Trial end, renewal, cancellation, refund boundary, and data export are clear | Checkout disclosure and cancellation confirmation |
How We Reviewed FX Replay
Sources were rechecked September 22, 2026 against FX Replay’s pricing, plan matrix, trial, cancellation, refund, prop simulator, futures, seconds-data, multi-asset, custom-indicator, Live Journal, account-sync, journal-coexistence, export and Mentor AI pages. TradingView claims were checked against its Replay Trading and historical-depth pages.
We did not receive compensation from FX Replay. Trader’s Second Brain is our product and appears only as a different actual-trade review and prop-rule workflow. Product documentation can establish a published feature; it cannot establish real-world reliability, data quality or suitability on your hardware. Our process is documented in the site’s editorial methodology.
Before You Subscribe: Check These
- Exact market: symbol, contract, provider, interval, first usable date, time zone, spread, commission, and corporate-roll behavior where relevant.
- Exact plan: sessions, records, retention, chart count, indicators, AI allowance, futures, seconds data, and custom timeframes.
- Exact journal job: Backtesting Journal, Live Journal, or both; connected source; imports; field map; deduplication; corrections; exports; and whether you need combined analytics.
- Exact prop program: region, account size, phase, daily/max-loss basis, reset time, consistency, minimum days, payout, prohibited conduct, and verified date.
- Exact billing state: card requirement on the screen you see, trial end, renewal total, tax, cancellation route, refund exception, and post-cancellation data access.
Cancel before the displayed renewal deadline if the test fails. Save the confirmation and export any session or journal evidence you may need later.
Final Verdict
FX Replay belongs on the shortlist for manual historical practice, especially when a retained backtesting record or configurable prop session matters. Beginner is a credible compatibility test. Intermediate may be enough for ordinary replay and prop practice. Pro earns consideration when futures, seconds intervals, custom timeframes, or unlimited workspace limits are actual requirements.
The old “practice tool, not a journal” conclusion is retired. FX Replay now has a paid Live Journal with documented sync and import routes. The more precise limitation is that Backtesting and Live Journals remain separate and do not combine analytics automatically.
Do not subscribe on a “best platform” label. Run the ten-trade protocol, inspect the real checkout because the official trial pages conflict, verify the exact market and plan, and treat all replay performance as hypothetical. If those tests pass, FX Replay may be worth the price for your workflow. If they do not, the right alternative depends on whether you need chart replay, offline simulation, coded tests, or imported-trade review.
