Trader's Second Brain Trader's Second Brain
Blue Guardian vs FundingPips

Blue Guardian vs FundingPips: which rules fit your trading?

FundingPips leads on current TSB Fit.

Compare the exact program rows that shape risk, payout timing, and the chance of surviving the account.

Official sources stay separate from offers. Commercial terms never change TSB Fit. How we verify

Compare exact prop firm programs

TSB Fit66 Blue Guardian
TSB Fit78 FundingPips
Selected program rule pressure comparison
RuleWhat it means and why it matters Blue Guardian1 Step Standard · Account-size based FundingPips2 Step Flex · Account-size based EdgeWhich firm has the advantage
Profit targetWhat you need to earn 10% 10% / 6% Verify
Daily lossIntraday loss pressure 4% 4% Verify
DrawdownHow the breach is measured 6% trailing 12% Verify
Minimum daysRequired trading pace Verify Verify Verify
Profit splitHow profits are shared 85%; 90% add-on available 85%-95% advertised FundingPips
Payout pathWhen you can get paid 14 days; 7-day add-on available Bi-weekly style Verify
Max scalePublished ceiling Scaling available $2M Verify
Make the shortlist

Who should pick each firm

Blue Guardian

A strong fit if you want
The decision

FundingPips

A strong fit if you want
Blue Guardian

Rule fit

Published target: 10%.

Target Which profit target fits your style?
FundingPips

Rule fit

Published target: 10% / 6%.

Blue Guardian

Trailing drawdown

Published threshold: 6% trailing.

Risk Which drawdown model do you prefer?
FundingPips

Loss model

4% daily / 12% max.

Blue Guardian

Platform fit

Works with MT5, MatchTrader, TradeLocker.

Setup Which operating path fits your workflow?
FundingPips

Platform fit

Works with MatchTrader, cTrader, TradeLocker.

Decision guide

Which challenge fits your trading?

  1. 01

    Rules first

    Check profit target, drawdown type, and key rule differences.

  2. 02

    Fit second

    Match the platform, market, and payout path to your trading.

  3. 03

    Checkout last

    Verify live price, availability, KYC, and payout terms.

All decision factors

Side-by-side comparison

Use this as a structured shortlist, not as final financial advice. Check live checkout price, KYC availability, rules, and payout terms before buying an evaluation.

Firm comparison by decision factor
Selected firms Blue GuardianForex/CFD challenge programs FundingPipsForex/CFD evaluation paths
TSB Fit Score 66/100 Research before paying 78/100 Strong comparison candidate
Markets Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto
Platforms MT5, MatchTrader, TradeLocker MatchTrader, cTrader, TradeLocker
Evaluation model Forex/CFD challenge programs Forex/CFD evaluation paths
Primary account size Account-size based Account-size based
Primary fee Checkout audit Checkout audit
Profit target 10% 10% / 6%
Daily loss 4% 4%
Max loss / drawdown 6% trailing 12%
Payout terms 85%; 90% add-on available / 14 days; 7-day add-on available 85%-95% advertised / Bi-weekly style
Max scale Scaling available $2M
Promo status No verified code - Offer watch No verified code - Offer watch
External trust signal Rating unavailable · 2K+ reviews 4.5 / 67K+ reviews
Mapped plans

Program rows and payout detail

These are the connected program rows TSB is using for this comparison. A firm can have multiple plans, so treat this as the mapped decision row and verify the official checkout before paying.

Mapped challenge programs, rule structure, loss limits, price, and payout details
Firm & program Structure Loss limits Price & payout
Blue Guardian 1 mapped program
Program 1 Step Standard Connected research row AccountAccount-size based Steps1 step Target10% Daily loss4% Max loss6% trailing PriceCheckout audit Profit split85%; 90% add-on available Payout path14 days; 7-day add-on available
Decision note

Blue Guardian forex and futures products differ; keep this 1-step forex row separate from Blue Guardian Futures.

FundingPips 1 mapped program
Program 2 Step Flex Connected research row AccountAccount-size based Steps2 steps Target10% / 6% Daily loss4% Max loss12% PriceCheckout audit Profit split85%-95% advertised Payout pathBi-weekly style
Decision note

The headline drawdown is trader-friendly, but exact model, add-ons, reward split, and checkout price should be verified before buying.

Evidence

Source and rule coverage

See what is officially mapped, where outside reputation data comes from, and which rule details still need a live check.

Evidence coverage and official source links for the two firms
Firm Program evidence External trust Rule checks Action
Blue GuardianForex/CFD challenge programs Official source mapped Official source snapshot

Blue Guardian forex and futures products differ; keep this 1-step forex row separate from Blue Guardian Futures.

Rating unavailable · 2K+ reviews Reviews counted only
  • Drawdown model: 6% trailing. Size positions from usable buffer, not headline allocation.
Official source
FundingPipsForex/CFD evaluation paths Official source mapped Official source snapshot

The headline drawdown is trader-friendly, but exact model, add-ons, reward split, and checkout price should be verified before buying.

4.5 / 67K+ reviews Trustpilot snapshot
  • Still check checkout, KYC, country availability, payout rules, platform fees, and refund terms before paying.
Official source
Continue the research

Best next checks

Quick answers

Blue Guardian vs FundingPips FAQ

  • 01

    Which side should I trust more?

    Use the side with stronger source coverage and rules that match your market. TSB Fit Score is a shortlist signal, not a guarantee.

  • 02

    Can a promo code change the decision?

    It can change checkout price, but it should not override drawdown pressure, payout terms, country availability, or platform fit.

  • 03

    Why do some rows say verify?

    Prop firm plans and checkout rules change often. TSB marks incomplete rows instead of presenting incomplete data as final.