Trader's Second Brain Trader's Second Brain
Audacity Capital vs FundingPips

Audacity Capital vs FundingPips: which rules fit your trading?

Close call — choose by loss model and payout path.

Compare the exact program rows that shape risk, payout timing, and the chance of surviving the account.

Official sources stay separate from offers. Commercial terms never change TSB Fit. How we verify

Compare exact prop firm programs

TSB Fit77 Audacity Capital
TSB Fit78 FundingPips
Selected program rule pressure comparison
RuleWhat it means and why it matters Audacity CapitalAbility Challenge · Account-size based FundingPips2 Step Flex · Account-size based EdgeWhich firm has the advantage
Profit targetWhat you need to earn Program-specific 10% / 6% Verify
Daily lossIntraday loss pressure Program-specific 4% Verify
DrawdownHow the breach is measured Program-specific 12% Verify
Minimum daysRequired trading pace Verify Verify Verify
Profit splitHow profits are shared Program-specific 85%-95% advertised Verify
Payout pathWhen you can get paid Program-specific Bi-weekly style Verify
Max scalePublished ceiling $2M $2M Verify
Make the shortlist

Who should pick each firm

Audacity Capital

A strong fit if you want
The decision

FundingPips

A strong fit if you want
Audacity Capital

Rule fit

Published target: Program-specific.

Target Which profit target fits your style?
FundingPips

Rule fit

Published target: 10% / 6%.

Audacity Capital

Loss model

Program-specific daily / Program-specific max.

Risk Which drawdown model do you prefer?
FundingPips

Loss model

4% daily / 12% max.

Audacity Capital

Platform fit

Works with MT4, MT5.

Setup Which operating path fits your workflow?
FundingPips

Platform fit

Works with MatchTrader, cTrader, TradeLocker.

Decision guide

Which challenge fits your trading?

  1. 01

    Rules first

    Check profit target, drawdown type, and key rule differences.

  2. 02

    Fit second

    Match the platform, market, and payout path to your trading.

  3. 03

    Checkout last

    Verify live price, availability, KYC, and payout terms.

All decision factors

Side-by-side comparison

Use this as a structured shortlist, not as final financial advice. Check live checkout price, KYC availability, rules, and payout terms before buying an evaluation.

Firm comparison by decision factor
Selected firms Audacity CapitalAbility Challenge and funded trader programs FundingPipsForex/CFD evaluation paths
TSB Fit Score 77/100 Strong comparison candidate 78/100 Strong comparison candidate
Markets Forex, Indices, Metals Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto
Platforms MT4, MT5 MatchTrader, cTrader, TradeLocker
Evaluation model Ability Challenge and funded trader programs Forex/CFD evaluation paths
Primary account size Account-size based Account-size based
Primary fee Published promotional entry price for the 5K Ability Challenge; 100K is $412 promotional / $549 list Checkout audit
Profit target Program-specific 10% / 6%
Daily loss Program-specific 4%
Max loss / drawdown Program-specific 12%
Payout terms Program-specific / Program-specific 85%-95% advertised / Bi-weekly style
Max scale $2M $2M
Promo status No verified code - Offer watch No verified code - Offer watch
External trust signal 4.5 / 100+ reviews 4.5 / 67K+ reviews
Mapped plans

Program rows and payout detail

These are the connected program rows TSB is using for this comparison. A firm can have multiple plans, so treat this as the mapped decision row and verify the official checkout before paying.

Mapped challenge programs, rule structure, loss limits, price, and payout details
Firm & program Structure Loss limits Price & payout
Audacity Capital 1 mapped program
Program Ability Challenge Connected research row AccountAccount-size based StepsChallenge path TargetProgram-specific Daily lossProgram-specific Max lossProgram-specific PricePublished promotional entry price for the 5K Ability Challenge; 100K is $412 promotional / $549 list Profit splitProgram-specific Payout pathProgram-specific
Decision note

Audacity combines older funding positioning with challenge-style products, so onboarding route and split should be compared before fee.

FundingPips 1 mapped program
Program 2 Step Flex Connected research row AccountAccount-size based Steps2 steps Target10% / 6% Daily loss4% Max loss12% PriceCheckout audit Profit split85%-95% advertised Payout pathBi-weekly style
Decision note

The headline drawdown is trader-friendly, but exact model, add-ons, reward split, and checkout price should be verified before buying.

Evidence

Source and rule coverage

See what is officially mapped, where outside reputation data comes from, and which rule details still need a live check.

Evidence coverage and official source links for the two firms
Firm Program evidence External trust Rule checks Action
Audacity CapitalAbility Challenge and funded trader programs Official source mapped Official source mapped

Audacity combines older funding positioning with challenge-style products, so onboarding route and split should be compared before fee.

4.5 / 100+ reviews Feefo snapshot
  • Still check checkout, KYC, country availability, payout rules, platform fees, and refund terms before paying.
Official source
FundingPipsForex/CFD evaluation paths Official source mapped Official source snapshot

The headline drawdown is trader-friendly, but exact model, add-ons, reward split, and checkout price should be verified before buying.

4.5 / 67K+ reviews Trustpilot snapshot
  • Still check checkout, KYC, country availability, payout rules, platform fees, and refund terms before paying.
Official source
Continue the research

Best next checks

Quick answers

Audacity Capital vs FundingPips FAQ

  • 01

    Which side should I trust more?

    Use the side with stronger source coverage and rules that match your market. TSB Fit Score is a shortlist signal, not a guarantee.

  • 02

    Can a promo code change the decision?

    It can change checkout price, but it should not override drawdown pressure, payout terms, country availability, or platform fit.

  • 03

    Why do some rows say verify?

    Prop firm plans and checkout rules change often. TSB marks incomplete rows instead of presenting incomplete data as final.