FundedNext wins on price, flexibility, and rule freedom. You get lower entry pricing, news trading, multiple challenge models, and profit splits up to 95%. What you do not get is FTMO's decade-level operating history. If raw trust is your only filter, FTMO still wins. If you want cheaper access and more flexibility, FundedNext is one of the strongest options available.
| Best for | Forex and CFD traders who want low entry cost and more flexible rules |
| Not for | Traders who only trust decade-old firms or need futures-specific funding |
| Starting cost | Approximately $59 on the smallest Evaluation tier |
| Strongest model | Evaluation for most traders, Stellar only if you can handle tighter drawdown |
| Biggest edge | News trading, no time limit, and more pricing flexibility than FTMO |
| Real risk | Shorter operating history and less proven longevity than FTMO |
| Our take | FundedNext is the best value pick for traders who want flexibility first and old-brand trust second. |
If the only thing pulling you in is the higher profit split, you are probably overweighting marketing and underweighting trust, support quality, and how cleanly the rules fit your strategy.
FundedNext Overview
FundedNext launched in 2022 out of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and has grown rapidly into one of the most-used prop firms in the industry. It consistently ranks among the best prop firms for traders who want flexible rules and high profit splits. In under four years they have built a product that directly competes with FTMO on features while undercutting on price and loosening some of the rules that frustrate traders at more established firms.
The core proposition is straightforward: pass a challenge, get a funded account, keep up to 95% of the profits. What separates FundedNext from the pack is the variety of challenge models they offer and the fact that they allow news trading — a restriction that FTMO enforces and that eliminates an entire category of trading strategies.
Here is what FundedNext offers at a glance:
- Multiple challenge models — Evaluation (2-phase), Express (1-phase), Stellar 1-Phase, and Stellar 2-Phase. Different models suit different risk tolerances and trading styles.
- Account sizes from $6K to $200K — Lower entry points than most competitors. A $6K Evaluation account starts at approximately $59.
- Up to 95% profit split — On Stellar accounts. This is the highest in the industry among major prop firms. FTMO caps at 90%.
- News trading allowed — Trade NFP, CPI, FOMC, and any other high-impact event. No restrictions. This is the single biggest differentiator versus FTMO.
- Multiple asset classes — Forex pairs, indices, commodities, and crypto. Broader than some competitors that limit you to forex only.
- Challenge fee refunded on first payout — If you pass and reach a funded account, the fee comes back with your first profit split.
Account Types & Challenge Rules
FundedNext offers more challenge models than any other major prop firm. This is genuinely useful — different models suit different strategies, risk profiles, and experience levels. But the variety also means you need to understand exactly what each model requires before choosing one.
Evaluation Model (2-Phase)
The Evaluation is FundedNext's most popular model and the closest equivalent to FTMO's standard challenge. Two phases, reasonable targets, and standard drawdown limits. This is where most traders should start.
- Phase 1: 10% profit target, 5% daily loss limit, 10% max overall loss, minimum 5 trading days
- Phase 2: 5% profit target, same loss limits, minimum 5 trading days
- Profit split: Starts at 80%, scales up over time
- No time limit to pass either phase (take as long as you need)
Express Model (1-Phase)
One phase only — simpler structure, but a much higher profit target. The Express model rewards traders who can produce a large gain consistently. It is not for cautious, slow-growth strategies.
- Single phase: 25% profit target
- Drawdown: 5% daily loss, 10% max overall loss
- Profit split: Starts at 60%, scales up to 90%
- No time limit to reach the target
Stellar 1-Phase
The Stellar models are FundedNext's premium offering. The 1-Phase Stellar has the highest eventual profit split (up to 95%) but tighter drawdown limits that will punish aggressive traders.
- Single phase: 10% profit target
- Tighter drawdown: 3% daily loss, 6% max overall loss
- Profit split: Starts at 80%, scales up to 95%
- Scaling plan available — grow your account size with consistent profits
Stellar 2-Phase
Same premium profit split as Stellar 1-Phase, but with two phases and slightly different targets. Drawdown limits remain tighter than the standard Evaluation model.
- Phase 1: 8% profit target | Phase 2: 5% profit target
- Drawdown: 3% daily loss, 6% max overall loss
- Profit split: Starts at 80%, scales up to 95%
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Evaluation (2-Phase) | Express (1-Phase) | Stellar 1-Phase | Stellar 2-Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phases | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Profit Target | 10% / 5% | 25% | 10% | 8% / 5% |
| Daily Loss Limit | 5% | 5% | 3% | 3% |
| Max Overall Loss | 10% | 10% | 6% | 6% |
| Min Trading Days | 5 per phase | 5 | 5 | 5 per phase |
| Time Limit | None | None | None | None |
| Starting Profit Split | 80% | 60% | 80% | 80% |
| Max Profit Split | 90% | 90% | 95% | 95% |
| Best For | Most traders | High-conviction | Disciplined / low-DD | Disciplined / scaling |
Fees & Pricing
FundedNext's pricing is competitive with FTMO and slightly cheaper at most account sizes. The challenge fee is a one-time cost per attempt. If you fail, the fee is not refunded. If you pass and reach a funded account, the fee is refunded with your first profit split payout.
| Account Size | Evaluation | Express | Stellar 1-Phase | Stellar 2-Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $6,000 | $59 | $59 | $59 | $59 |
| $15,000 | $119 | $119 | $119 | $119 |
| $25,000 | $199 | $199 | $199 | $199 |
| $50,000 | $299 | $299 | $299 | $299 |
| $100,000 | $549 | $549 | $549 | $549 |
| $200,000 | $999 | $999 | $999 | $999 |
Use the prop firm calculator to compare fees across firms. Note: prices are approximate and FundedNext frequently runs promotions and discount codes. Check their website for current pricing. Prices are generally consistent across models for the same account size, though this can vary during promotions.
Profit Split & Payouts
This is where FundedNext gets aggressive. The profit split structure is among the most generous in the industry, particularly on Stellar accounts where it reaches 95%. Here is how the payout system works in practice.
Profit split by model
| Model | Starting Split | Maximum Split | How to Scale Up |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation | 80% | 90% | Consistent profitability over time |
| Express | 60% | 90% | Consistent profitability over time |
| Stellar 1-Phase | 80% | 95% | Scaling plan milestones |
| Stellar 2-Phase | 80% | 95% | Scaling plan milestones |
Payout frequency and methods
- Payout frequency: Bi-weekly (every 14 days) for most account types
- Processing time: 1–3 business days after you request the payout
- Payment methods: Bank transfer, cryptocurrency, Deel, Rise
- Minimum payout: Varies by method, but generally low thresholds
Scaling plan
FundedNext offers a scaling plan that increases your account size over time if you demonstrate consistent profitability. The exact requirements depend on your model, but the general structure is: maintain profitability over multiple payout cycles, stay within drawdown limits, and your account balance gets bumped up. This is a meaningful advantage for long-term traders — you can grow from a $25K account to $50K, $100K, and beyond without purchasing a new challenge.
Trading Rules
FundedNext's rule set is more permissive than FTMO's in several important areas. The biggest difference is news trading, but there are other details that matter depending on your trading style. Here is the complete rule breakdown.
| Rule | Evaluation / Express | Stellar Models | Funded Account |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Loss Limit | 5% | 3% | Same as challenge |
| Max Overall Loss | 10% | 6% | Same as challenge |
| News Trading | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend Holding | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
| Lot Size Limits | None | None | None |
| Copy Trading | Own accounts OK | Own accounts OK | Own accounts OK |
| Min Trading Days | 5 per phase | 5 per phase | None |
| Time Limit | None | None | None |
Key rule details
News trading is fully allowed. This is FundedNext's most significant competitive advantage. FTMO restricts trading within a window around major economic news events (NFP, CPI, central bank decisions). FundedNext has no such restriction on any model. If your strategy relies on trading news volatility, this alone might be the deciding factor.
No lot size limits. You manage your own risk. FundedNext does not impose maximum lot sizes — your only constraints are the daily loss limit and max overall loss. This gives aggressive scalpers and position traders more flexibility, but also more rope to hang themselves with.
EAs and bots are permitted. Automated trading strategies are allowed on all models. This includes Expert Advisors on MetaTrader and any algorithmic strategies. Copy trading from your own accounts is also permitted, but mirroring signals from third-party copy trading services may be restricted — check FundedNext's current terms for the latest policy.
FundedNext vs FTMO
FTMO is the industry benchmark, so the comparison is inevitable. Both firms are legitimate and both pay out real money. (For another solid alternative, see our The5ers review.) But the products are meaningfully different in ways that matter depending on your trading style.
| Feature | FundedNext | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2022 | 2015 |
| Challenge Fee ($100K) | ~$549 | ~$540 |
| Profit Target (Phase 1) | 10% | 10% |
| Daily Loss Limit | 5% (Eval) / 3% (Stellar) | 5% |
| Max Overall Loss | 10% (Eval) / 6% (Stellar) | 10% (trailing) |
| Max Profit Split | 95% (Stellar) | 90% |
| News Trading | Allowed | Restricted |
| Payout Frequency | Bi-weekly | Bi-weekly (after first 30 days) |
| Payout Speed | 1–3 business days | 1–2 business days |
| Scaling Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Account Models | 4 (Eval, Express, Stellar x2) | 1 (Standard 2-phase) |
| Track Record / Trust | ~4 years | 10+ years |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
When FundedNext wins
- News trading strategies. If your edge depends on trading around NFP, CPI, FOMC, or ECB announcements, FTMO is not an option. FundedNext is.
- Maximum profit split. FundedNext's Stellar accounts reach 95%. FTMO caps at 90%. Over time, that 5% difference compounds.
- Variety of challenge types. FundedNext lets you choose between 1-phase and 2-phase models with different risk profiles. FTMO offers one standard path.
- Lower entry points. $6K accounts starting at ~$59 make FundedNext more accessible for traders testing the waters.
When FTMO wins
- Track record and trust. FTMO has been operating since 2015 with $400M+ in documented payouts. That decade of history is worth something. FundedNext has not been tested through the same time horizon.
- Brand recognition. FTMO is the most recognized name in prop trading. If credibility matters to you (for a resume, social proof, or personal confidence), FTMO's brand carries more weight.
- Simpler structure. One challenge model means less confusion. You know exactly what you are signing up for. FundedNext's four models can be overwhelming for first-timers.
- Marginally faster payouts. FTMO's 1–2 day processing is slightly faster than FundedNext's 1–3 days. Not a huge difference, but it exists.
For a deeper dive into this comparison, see our full guide: FTMO vs FundedNext →
What Real Traders Say
We reviewed trader feedback across Trustpilot, Reddit, and trading forums to identify the most common themes. Here is an honest summary of what people actually report — both good and bad.
The general consensus across trading communities: FundedNext is a solid choice, especially for news traders and those who want the highest profit split. But it does not have the decade-long track record of FTMO, and that matters to a meaningful segment of traders.
How to Prepare for FundedNext
Buying a challenge without preparation is the most common way to waste money on prop firms. The traders who pass consistently are the ones who treat the challenge as a known obstacle with known rules, not a gamble. Here is how to prepare properly.
1. Backtest your strategy under FundedNext's rules
Before spending money on a challenge, run your strategy through historical data with FundedNext's exact drawdown limits applied. If your strategy historically breaches a 5% daily loss limit more than 10% of the time, it will likely fail the challenge. Adjust position sizing until the strategy fits within the rules.
Our backtesting guide covers this in detail: How to Build & Backtest a Trading Strategy →
2. Practice proper position sizing
The difference between a strategy that passes a funded challenge and one that fails is almost always position sizing, not the strategy itself. If you risk 2% per trade on a standard account, you might need to drop to 1% or less for a Stellar account with its 3% daily limit.
Read our position sizing guide for prop firms: Position Sizing for Prop Firms →
3. Run a mock challenge with a trading journal
Before purchasing a FundedNext challenge, simulate one. Trade your demo account for 2–4 weeks with the exact rules of your chosen model applied. Track every trade in a journal and review whether you would have passed or failed. This costs nothing and tells you more about your readiness than any amount of theoretical planning.
If you do not have a trading journal: How to Build a Trading Journal →
4. Use a prop firm simulator
TSB Expert includes a prop firm simulator that mimics the rules of FundedNext, FTMO, and other major firms. It applies the daily loss limit, max drawdown, and profit target to your trades in real time so you can see exactly how close you are to passing or failing at any point. This is the fastest way to validate your readiness without paying for a challenge.
5. Choose the right model for your style
- Conservative, steady gains? → Evaluation (2-phase) is the safest bet. Standard drawdown limits, two phases to prove yourself.
- High-conviction, fewer trades? → Express (1-phase) if you can hit 25%. Not for everyone.
- Very disciplined, low drawdown? → Stellar. But only if your max historical daily drawdown is consistently under 2%. The 3% limit leaves almost no room for error.
Who Should NOT Use FundedNext
FundedNext is a strong option for most forex and CFD traders, but it is not the right fit for everyone. Here are three profiles that should look elsewhere:
- Scalpers who need the tightest possible spreads. FundedNext spreads are competitive but not the tightest in the industry. If your strategy depends on sub-pip precision and you trade dozens of positions per day, slippage during news events (reported by multiple traders) can erode your edge. Look at firms with direct market access if spread quality is non-negotiable.
- Traders who distrust newer firms. FundedNext has been operating since 2022 — solid but not battle-tested through a full market cycle. If you watched MyForexFunds and TrueForexFunds disappear and swore you would only use firms with 5+ years of track record, FTMO or The5ers are safer bets for your peace of mind.
- Futures traders. FundedNext is forex and CFDs only. If you trade ES, NQ, crude oil futures, or other CME products, FundedNext cannot help you. Look at TopStep or Apex for futures-focused prop funding.
Track Your FundedNext Challenge
Use TSB Pro to journal every trade during your challenge. See your real-time drawdown, track your progress toward the profit target, and know exactly where you stand before it is too late.
Start Tracking FreeFree plan available. No credit card required.
Ready to start the challenge? Open a FundedNext account →
Affiliate link — we receive a commission if you purchase a challenge. This does not affect our assessment.
