Your losses are not random.
See where the money leaks.
Import your trades. TSB finds the repeated behaviors draining your P/L, shows your strongest edge, and gives you one rule for the next session.
Raw trades in.
Clear decisions out.
Connect MT4/MT5, exchange APIs, CSV, Notion, or log manually. The engine normalizes messy inputs before any review starts.
Produce evidence.
One clean data layer feeds Journal, Leak Map, Review Loop, Playbook, reports, and capital checks.
The review system
inside TSB.
A connected set of product surfaces for the full review workflow: journal context, leak diagnosis, rule carry, playbook validation, and capital proof.
Journal keeps the context attached.
Table, grid, and calendar views keep each closed trade tied to setup, session, behavior, screenshots, notes, and review state.
Explain the trade, then test the setup.
AI Coach turns your history into review questions and explanations. Backtester checks whether the setup has enough evidence before it becomes part of your playbook.
Separate proven setups from ideas.
Playbook keeps setups honest. A strategy does not become core until the sample, drift, and execution quality support it.
Test the prop account before it breaks.
Prop Tracker keeps challenge limits, daily drawdown, payouts, phases, and account-specific review visible before one bad session ruins the attempt.
See whether discipline shows up in capital.
Dashboard closes the loop by checking equity, consistency, accounts, and behavior against the rules you said you would trade.
Stop guessing why
the account bleeds.
Leak Map turns your journal into capital attribution: what is leaking now, which edge is clean, and what rule trades next.
This is where your trading leaks.
Ranked by evidence, impact, and the one rule to execute next session.
London stays green at +€412.91, while Asia leaks -€25.56.
Tag every trade before promoting any setup or changing size.
-€25.56Recent expectancy fell to -€9.91 per trade from +€74.77.
Review execution before taking it again.
-€29.74Top setup wins at 71.4% WR with PF 7.49. New York produces +€190.65.
Increase allocation in New York while keeping the daily risk cap intact.
+€348.46Stop after 2 losses, skip Friday PM, and review London BOS+FVG before sizing up.
More than a journal.
Complete review stack.
Most journals stop at the log. TSB keeps the same trade history connected to review, leak detection, rules, validation, reports, and capital proof.
Bring in the data you already have.
CSV, manual entries, MT4/MT5 EA, selected exchange sync, broker exports, voice notes, and optional Notion context.
Split one history into the layers that explain it.
Session, setup, behavior, outcome, review status, repeated leaks, rules, and account behavior stay tied to the same evidence.
Leave with rules.
Not another dashboard.
AI explanations, review commands, validation runs, reports, exports, and share paths all come from the same trade memory.
What could one repeated leak be costing you?
Model one repeated behavior with four assumptions. Not a forecast; a clearer way to decide what deserves review.
A mistake gets expensive when it becomes routine.
Start with a profile, then adjust frequency and average loss. Inside TSB, this estimate is replaced by real history, tags, and review evidence.
Keep it simple: how often it repeats, what it usually costs, and how long you have let it run.
Own the review system.
Not another subscription.
Most journals rent dashboards month-to-month. TSB gives you the review layer as a one-time purchase: lifetime access, exportable data, and behavioral AI included.
| What Actually Matters | TSB Best fit | TradeZella | TraderSync | Edgewonk | Excel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Year Cost | $249 onceLifetime access | $1,188 | $1,080 | $591 | Free |
| You Own Your Data | OwnedExport anytime | Access tied to subscription | Access tied to subscription | Local only | Manual, but yours |
| AI Review On Your Trades | IncludedBehavioral AI | No behavioral AI | No behavioral AI | No behavioral AI | No behavioral AI |
| Review Across Accounts | Built inAcross accounts | Paid tiers | Paid tiers | Not supported | DIY only |
| Workflow Fit | FlexibleReview workflow | Closed box | Closed box | Rule-heavy | Manual overhead |
| Secondary feature comparison | |||||
| Price | $249 once | $396/yr | $360/yr | $197/yr | Free |
| Strategy Backtester | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| 30+ Analytics Views | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Lifetime Access | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Setup Time | <60 sec | 5-10 min | 5-10 min | 10-15 min | Hours |
Comparison based on publicly available data as of March 2026. Features and pricing may change.
What traders start seeing
once the data is clear
The kinds of changes traders report once their history is organized, reviewed, and turned into rules.
Imported 312 MT5 trades. The leak was obvious: XAU/USD after two red trades was down $1,840.
On a $100k FTMO challenge, TSB showed the daily drawdown risk was re-entry, not position size.
Bybit import grouped 68 BTC and ETH trades. My 58% win rate looked fine until Asia session showed the drag.
MT5 sync pulled EUR/USD and NAS100 into the journal. Friday PM had 12 trades, 9 red. That became rule one.
Finally one place connecting win rate, setup, and notes. My 62% London BOS was hidden under flat P/L.
My TopStep combine kept slipping after trade four. TSB made the rule simple: max 3 trades after NY open.
I was paying monthly just to store trades. Here the CSV, screenshots, and rules live together, and I can export them.
XAU/USD Friday PM was -$620 across 14 trades. I knew it felt bad; TSB made it measurable.
The next-session rule is what made it stick. After two red trades, review comes before any re-entry.
Imported 312 MT5 trades. The leak was obvious: XAU/USD after two red trades was down $1,840.
On a $100k FTMO challenge, TSB showed the daily drawdown risk was re-entry, not position size.
Bybit import grouped 68 BTC and ETH trades. My 58% win rate looked fine until Asia session showed the drag.
MT5 sync pulled EUR/USD and NAS100 into the journal. Friday PM had 12 trades, 9 red. That became rule one.
Finally one place connecting win rate, setup, and notes. My 62% London BOS was hidden under flat P/L.
My TopStep combine kept slipping after trade four. TSB made the rule simple: max 3 trades after NY open.
I was paying monthly just to store trades. Here the CSV, screenshots, and rules live together, and I can export them.
XAU/USD Friday PM was -$620 across 14 trades. I knew it felt bad; TSB made it measurable.
The next-session rule is what made it stick. After two red trades, review comes before any re-entry.
For my FundedNext account, the issue was not the profit target. It was one rule break near max daily loss.
New York 9:30-11:00 was 71% WR. After lunch was negative. I stopped mixing those sessions together.
The AI asked why I entered my third GBP/JPY trade. I had no answer, and the tag history proved it.
My weekly review showed 43 trades, but only 11 were playbook setups. That changed what I tracked next week.
The what-if view put a number on overtrading: about $540 of avoidable drag in one month of small trades.
Equity by setup separated FVG from everything else. One setup had PF 2.4; the rest was just noise.
I connected Oanda, then realized my “good” EUR/USD idea was only working in London, not New York.
IBKR import removed the excuse. 126 equity trades were already there, so the Sunday review actually happened.
After trade four, my quality dropped from A/B to C setups. Seeing that row made the limit easy to accept.
For my FundedNext account, the issue was not the profit target. It was one rule break near max daily loss.
New York 9:30-11:00 was 71% WR. After lunch was negative. I stopped mixing those sessions together.
The AI asked why I entered my third GBP/JPY trade. I had no answer, and the tag history proved it.
My weekly review showed 43 trades, but only 11 were playbook setups. That changed what I tracked next week.
The what-if view put a number on overtrading: about $540 of avoidable drag in one month of small trades.
Equity by setup separated FVG from everything else. One setup had PF 2.4; the rest was just noise.
I connected Oanda, then realized my “good” EUR/USD idea was only working in London, not New York.
IBKR import removed the excuse. 126 equity trades were already there, so the Sunday review actually happened.
After trade four, my quality dropped from A/B to C setups. Seeing that row made the limit easy to accept.
Full access. Paid once.
Start free with one import. Upgrade when you want the complete review layer: Leak Map, AI Coach, backtests, reports, and account-wide evidence in one workflow.
Complete review system.
One paid-once review system for importing trades, finding repeated leaks, carrying rules, validating setups, and proving discipline in capital.
- Import & syncMT4/MT5, CSV, broker exports, manual review
- Journal contextTable, grid, calendar, tags, screenshots, review state
- Leak MapRepeated behavior, evidence, impact, next rule
- AI CoachExplanations and voice debrief on your trade history
- BacktesterTest setups against real trade behavior
- PlaybookSeparate proven setups from ideas
- ReportsWeekly, monthly, yearly review summaries
- Capital checksAccount cards, cash flow, partial exits, discipline proof
Built from execution mistakes. Not theory.
I didn’t need more charts. I needed a feedback loop that showed me what was breaking down and what to fix next.
TSB started because Gary could see the trades, but not the repeated behaviors behind them. The goal was a review loop on real history: what is leaking, what is working, and what rule should carry into the next session.
Built for traders who want evidence, ownership, and a workflow they can keep instead of renting another dashboard every month.
Last questions before you start?
Short answers for the things that usually block a trader before importing real history.